I had a friend hit me up with this break down of the symbolism behind the music video to the new Kanye West single “Power” shit is interesting, check it:

The symbols of POWER: The music video by Kanye West.

Many of the symbols tell a tale of men of power but mostly these symbols tell a lot about Kanye.

The Trappings of POWER.

Frame 1

Kanye gives himself up as a slave to the material, and portrays himself as some sort of savior, leader, messiah. Proof of this is the presence of the Egyptian god Horus around his neck. 25 B.C. Eqypt. We see lineages of Pharaohs that claim to be  Horus  in life and Osiris in death thus giving themselves theological authority over the world.

Frame 2

We see more Egyptian imagery with the twin portrayals of Hathor. The cow horned goddess of love, wife of Horus. They hold staffs in their hands. Not shepherds staffs. These staffs are very phallic in their symbolism, however we observe them pounding the earth with these staffs using great force.  The staff when pounded on the earth in this manner serves as a conductor,  a direct line of communication between our world and the spirit world. This form of communication is used in Bantu religious traditions of  West Africa, more specifically in Ki-Kongo traditions, where they use this action to conjure their ancestors.

Above him are the gods and ancestors engaged in a cleansing act but also wielding knives indicating witchcraft or sorcery. The casting off of veils. A symbol of revelation.Why do they look like theyr’e upside down? Look at painted scenes on cathedral ceilings and you’ll see what I mean.(St. Peters Basilica) That’s how it looks on a dome or cupula in a basilica or cathedral.

He is surrounded with the trappings of success, wealth, wine, women and song .Dancing girls and lovers in poses of longing.

Frame 3+4

Lust. One of  the seven deadly sins but also part and parcel in the trappings of success. Couples engaged in what looks like Kama Sutra sex poses, and a tortured rapturous woman.

Beauty,sexuality, and seduction. Notice the wings. they open as if calling or inviting. But there are four wings . She can fly away quickly. Here now gone tomorrow. It is fleeting .

Frame 5

he soldiers of the left and right. A skinhead and a  dread or rasta locking swords. I say the soldiers because those in power don’t do the dirty work they leave it to the fringes. The sword through the Halo. More erotic symbolism but also funny enough the halo is a modern meteorological symbol and in some contexts it means visibility impaired by smoke. So Kanye is covered by the smoke symbol and surrounded by frames that mirror themselves going way back.  Power and control is manipulation and it’s all”Smoke and Mirrors”. On the other hand the sun, nimbus clouds behind Kanye, and the halo also connote purity. The sword above his head  represents the sword of Damocles who’s legend basically says METUS EST PLENUS TYRANNI: Fear is plentiful for tyrants. The other moral of the story of Damocles is never judge a man until youv’e walked a mile in his shoes.

Thats my quick runoff of this video, but it’s mostly a showcase for Kanyes fascination with Illuminati symbols and his hangups with women and sex in general. He can’t find Hathor. Thats cause she’s painted white. He will never find true love symbolized by Hathor cause he can’t see her under that white skin.

Sponsored Rapidshare Search

This site kind of reminds me of a Torrent search engine but it’s for sites like Rapidshare. You type in a file name, could be a song, artist name, program name, etc click search and the site pulls up results from different file hosting sites across the net that have the file available for download. There’s also a comments section that can be used to see if anyone has encountered any problems downloading the file. I like it because the problem I always had with Torrents was the difficulty I had with finding an individual song or file. I could find almost any complete album but not a single song.

Try Rapidshare Search now by clicking the link below:
Rapidshare Search

Sponsor

I saw an eye doctor post on a message board that a girl asked him to measure her eye pupil. He declined but I saw something else disturbing in reply to his post on the forum. Another doctor stated that he should do it and charge her 40-50 dollars for it but write down his assessment in a manner that is only decipherable to another eye professional. Alarming practice don’t you think?

According to ZenniOptical.com what the young lady had asked for was a PD. The PD or Pupillary Distance, is the distance between the pupils of the eyes, center to center, in Millimeters which is needed to ensure proper eyeglass fitment. The reluctance of an Eye Doctor to give a patient his or her PD is a result of fear that a patient may take that information and seek out a cheaper eyeglass retailer such as ZenniOptical.com. I recall seeing a more than a few references made on that board to the problems caused by the lower prices of competitors. I understand Doctors wanting to protect their interest but restricting access to your personal information as a means of protecting themselves from competitive pricing is no way to do it. Check out ZenniOptical.com low priced eyeglasses

via Teenage Girls Undergo ‘Breast Ironing’ In Cameroon VIDEO.

Check out my Editorial featured on Newraporder.com

Hip-Hop Slang; Fundamental American Dialect.

My girl’s mom takes our daughter with her to a party, even better right? We still had my son though. He falls asleep. Great. We lie him down and try to get the shot. So as we begin he wakes up grunting and groaning, clearly very unhappy he wasn’t in the comfort of someone’s arms. Rather than wait until he fell back asleep to try to resume getting the shot, I thought, why not take it with him.

Emcees take photos in front of fancy cars, holding blunts, standing next to girls bent over with their hands on their ass, holding guns and all that. All this to promote some kind of idea of who they are and what they’re about. This is what I’m about, the future!

While watching the 6:30 evening news on WPIX-TV, New York, I caught their quick rundown of stories they’d be covering once returning from commercial break. One of the stories featured was on a bill sponsored by two Brooklyn Assembly Members, Annette Robinson (D-Bedford Stuyvesant) and Darryl Towns (D-East New York) that would mandate police officers to shoot to wound rather than to kill a suspect. Patiently, I waited until the program returned from break to hear the details. They quickly reported the; who, what, when, where, why and moved on. Later in the program the matter was addressed in an editorial segment titled “Lionel” which, to sum up, is an old white guy ranting about the good old days. I found myself to be incensed by his insensitive, unsympathetic, uninformed, and irresponsible diatribe on the issue. Describing the bill as something that would require police officers “to shoot gun-wielding suspects in the arm or leg rather than shoot to kill” and declaring the people that the bill would protect to be “thugs”, he amazed me with his interpretation. In attempts to further drive home his point he highlighted the accidental fatal shootings of civilians by police officers only to note how rarely they occur stating, “The bill was intended to curb erroneous police shootings, an extremely rare event when you think of it with a police force of over 35,000 in a city of over 8 million.” and insinuating them to be necessary evils in the war against crime. Topping things off, he ended his segment with a clip of police officers carrying a casket of a slain fellow officer.

Welcome my friends, to the Spin Cycle. Reading another article on the issue in the New York Post I found similar language that reference to those who would benefit from the bill as “thugs” and the term “gun-wielding suspects”. Either ignorant minds think alike or maybe the Detective Endowment Association sent out a memo to their close friends and confidants in the media, I don’t know. The headline did read “Cops furious at ‘don’t kill’ bill”.

All I have read is what has been placed in the media spin cycle regarding the bill. I haven’t seen the bill actually posted anywhere online or in any of these articles that are critical of its language. The New York Post reported that the minimum force bill “seeks to amend the state penal codes’ ‘justification’ clause that allows an officer the right to kill a thug if he feels his life or someone else’s is in imminent danger.” And that it “would force officers to use their weapons ‘with the intent to stop, rather than kill’ a suspect. They would be mandated to ‘shoot a suspect in the arm or the leg.’ The line that states that the bill would mandate that officers shoot a suspect in the arm or leg is placed as a direct quote but in what context is it in the bill? Is it even in the bill or was it a comment made by an officer in reference to the bill? Was it a comment made by a politician in explanation of the bill? Who’s responsible for the quote? Because the quotes are placed in reference to the bill it leaves people to assume that all of the quoted comments are in the actual language of the bill, but that’s not necessarily so. This is kind of reminiscent of lawyers philosophy of not lying but instead withholding elements of the truth to manipulate opinion.

Comparing the proposal of changes that the minimum force act would implement to the actual existing penal code the New York Post posted this:

THE PROPOSAL

Section of Assembly Bill A02952

“A police officer or peace officer . . . uses such force with the intent to stop, rather than kill . . . and uses only the minimal amount of force necessary to affect such stop.”
THE CURRENT LAW

Section of state Penal Law S 35.15(2)(a)(ii)

“A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person . . . unless: he or she is . . . a police officer or peace officer or a person assisting a police officer or a peace officer at the latter’s direction.”

As also noted in the article cops are currently taught to shoot at the center of their target and fire their weapon until the threat has been stopped. The term “threat” is so ambiguous and completely at the discretion of the officer. In the case of 1999 Bronx, New York African immigrant, Amadou Diallo, cops felt “threatened” by a wallet to the extent of firing 41 shots fatally slaying an innocent man returning home from a hard day’s work. In the 2007 case of mentally ill Kheil Coppin police officers felt “threatened” by a hairbrush to the extent of firing 20 shots and fatally killing a 19 year old child that was reportedly mentally ill. Had officers been mandated to use minimum as opposed to maximum force, maybe these lives could have been spared.

The bill doesn’t disarm police officers, it doesn’t require that they use blanks; it just states that officers exercise minimal force as opposed to maximum and fatal force. In protesting this bill representatives of the New York City Police Force are essentially saying that they need a license to kill in order to effectively police.

“It’s moronic and would create two sets of rules in the streets if there is a gunfight. This legislation would require officers to literally shoot the gun out of someone’s hand or shoot to wound them in the leg or arm. I don’t know of any criminal who doesn’t shoot to kill. They are not bound by any restrictions.”

Taking a look at the language of the representatives of the police regarding this bill gives me the sense that the police are criminalizing anyone they encounter in the capacity of making an arrest in suspicion of a crime. A suspect is not a criminal until he or she is proven guilty in a court of law. It is the officer’s job to get a suspect to a court of law where he or she can be proven innocent or guilty. It is not up to our police force to act as judge, jury, and executioner.

Representatives of the police force, media outlets such as The New York Post, and personalities like “Lionel” would have people believe that it is unreasonable to ask that our officers act within the confines of the law they’ve been sworn to abide by. They want you to believe that our officers are operating in environments of such extreme lawlessness that they are in constant fear for their lives and in constant fear of criminals that want nothing more than to murder them. The fact is that these officers are operating inside of a city that is statistically safer than it has ever been and there has been only one death of an officer killed in the line of duty in New York City since 2006.

Since the tragic death of Officer Russel Timoshenko in 2007, the lone officer killed in that time span by gunfire in the line of duty at the hands of someone other than a fellow officer, there has been many deaths at the hands of members of the NYPD police force. At least four of those deaths were shrouded in uncertainty over the events leading up to and causing the loss of what is to be presumed as innocent lives. In 2006 there was the fatal shooting of Sean Bell, an unarmed black man on his wedding night in which police felt “threatened” to the extent of firing 50 rounds at his SUV after reportedly hearing someone say they were going to get a gun.

In 2007 there was the fatal shooting of a teenager named Khiel Coppin, in which officers felt “threatened” enough to fire 20 rounds after mistakenly confusing his hairbrush for a gun. Darryl Battle, a 20 year old man, was fatally shot to death by police in 2008 after police claimed he cornered them with a kitchen knife nearly a foot long. Reportedly only 6 ft away from Battle the officers found they had no alternative but to fire a fatal shot into Battle’s chest in order to “stop the threat”. At a distance of 6 feet the officers found it impossible to aim for his arm or leg.

In 2008 two brothers, Dwayne David, 22 and Keyshawn Forde, 21, were shot dead after officers reportedly claimed they had fired into a crowd outside of a Brownsville night club. According to the officers account as reported by the Daily News “They identified themselves as police, but the brothers ignored calls to drop their guns and charged forward, police said”. Contrasting the officer’s reports of the two brothers charging forward was an autopsy revealing the brothers to have been shot in the back. Maybe Dwayne David, and Keyshawn Forde were guilty of firing into a crowd outside of a Brownsville night club, maybe they weren’t. We’ll never know because neither got the opportunity to stand trial and be proven guilty or innocent.

Aside from the deaths of innocent citizens there were at least 3 deaths of police officers at the hands of other police officers in New York City, which I am aware of. One being Omar J. Edwards, a black police officer who was slain by his fellow officers while chasing a suspect out of uniform. Cops mistook Edwards for an armed assailant fatally shooting him three times in the left arm, side, and back; injuring his heart, left lung, and piercing his chest until the “threat was stopped” after reportedly shouting “Police, Drop it” and seeing Edwards turn while armed in their direction. The shooting deaths of officers Christopher Ridle( 2008) and Eric Hernandez (2006) by their fellow officers were also hailed as tragic cases of mistaken identity. Perhaps had they shot to wound they would have been able to save the lives of their fellow officers. This brings us to a total of SEVEN lives lost at the hands of the New York Police Department in the time span of 4 years.

The presence of a suspect in possession of a firearm isn’t always an admission of guilt or a cause for fatal force even if a suspect fails to comply with an officer’s command to drop his weapon. As stated in a New York Times article on racial bias and police shootings, “[the] failure to comply is often simply the rapid turning of the head and body to determine the source of the verbal command” referred to as “reflexive spin.” According to that same article “the last killing of a white off-duty officer by an on-duty colleague in a mistaken-identity case in the United States happened in 1982.”

In all of these examples the victims were black or Hispanic. As a black man I face a different reality in relation to the police than white citizens. When I’m walking home from work in the middle of the night and a police car approaches me I am fearful. I am fearful because there is a strong possibility that those officers may mistake my wallet, hairbrush, key-chain, or cell phone for a weapon and I could be fatally shot. Police officers want us to believe that because they are police officers that when they encounter an armed suspect it’s logical for them to assume that that suspect has intentions of doing them harm and because of that “threat” they want us to permit them to “shoot and kill” any suspect they encounter that they “believe” to be armed. The cases I have highlighted in this article support that in many instances what the officers “believe” is wrong and leads to the deaths of the innocent.

A recent report by the New York Times highlighted research headed by Christopher E. Stone, the Guggenheim professor of criminal justice at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, which exposed racial bias as playing a role in police shootings. According to that New York Times article “Research reveals that race may play a role in an officer’s instantaneous assessment of whether a particular person presents a danger or not.” And “Inherent or unconscious racial bias plays a role in ‘shoot/don’t-shoot,’ decisions made by officers of all races and ethnicities.” Currently by law officers have the right to shoot and kill any person they deem to be a threat. What the research highlighted in the New York Times showcases is that what officers perceive to be a threat isn’t always “a gun wielding suspect” or “thug” but at times simply a reaction to the complexion of someone’s skin.

Allow me to paint a picture. I am a black man on my home from a night job at 12am in the morning. I live in a crime infested Bronx community where my life is in constant danger. In fact, I live not too far from where police officers fatally fired 41 shots into Amadou Diallo. Because of the dangers I face in my community I am carrying a loaded fire arm that I am registered and licensed to carry. A cop approaches behind me. He shouts for me to stop and turn to face him. I turn. As I turn I see the officer reach for what I assume to be a gun. I think of Amadou Diallo, Patrick Dorismond, Sean Bell, and the many black men that have fallen victim to police gunfire; fearful that I may be facing the same fate I fire a shot fatally killing the officer. Due to my circumstances and my belief of the level of “threat” that I faced, are my actions justified? Borrowing from one of the undocumented policies of our NYPD Police force, It’s better to have a trial by twelve than be carried by six.

The treatment of this bill will give insight into the value that New York legislators place on the lives of their minority citizens. I urge and encourage all who have marched in protest of police brutality and the lost lives of the innocent to show just as much due diligence in getting out and supporting this bill.

Update:
I found the bill. It’s Assembly Bill A02952 here’s the link to it http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A02952&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y

by Gif

Funny thing is, if we’re racially categorizing people by skin color black people aren’t black they’re brown; yet, so are Middle Easterners and Hispanics. Aren’t Asians classified as yellow? Yeah, I almost forgot that there are yellow black people too. Wait, how can somebody be yellow and black at the same time? It’s a miracle I guess.

Sitting in front of the idiot box the other day I got a glimpse of the security scanners that American airlines are considering implementing into their security systems.  The security scanners turn the Airport into a strip club. It’s not like X-Ray vision where you see a skeletal frame; you can actually see body parts like Vaginas and Penises. One report stated that you could see the beads of sweat on a person’s back, their body piercings and even breast implants.

Paparazzi need not snoop around for the accidental, on purpose crotch shot from Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, now all the paparazzi has to do is camp out by the airport security checking points.

It’s all for our safety though, so we should embrace it. After all, there really is no other way.

It’s not like the terrorist organizations that developed the plan to successfully blow up the World Trade Center are capable of creating synthetic skin lined with explosive substances that can be triggered by a hard blow. That shit is impossible. How about a terrorist organization creating a clone of a human-being that is a bomb? Let me stop before terrorists start reading my blog for new tactics. I think the C.I.A may already be reading this, how many times have I used the term “terrorist”?

I have a suggestion. How about we build a list of all explosive materials,  I mean anything that can be used in the capacity of an explosive and create a machine that can detect the chemicals that are in those materials.

Technology has provided humanity with unlimited possibilities. We have the ability to clone things; we have the ability to make things invisible. Being able to make things invisible, is it possible we could make them invisible to something like a security scanning machine?

On a serious note, this terrorism shit has people afraid. People become stupid when they’re afraid and do things that they probably wouldn’t do under normal circumstances. You watch the news, and hear people get asked about the new security scanners, and they say, “If it means not getting my ass blown all over the sky I’m cool with it”. The thing is; it doesn’t.

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.”

— Benjamin Franklin

You find yourself with not enough time to do the things you need to do to make your art your job. You can’t invest the time to make your art pay your bills because of the job that you have that pays your bills but can’t quit because what’s going to pay your bills until your art can? It’s really a brain busting situation. After quitting numerous jobs and going through numerous ups and downs with your art, the grandiose dreams come to an end. You no longer aspire to be grand, you’d still like to be, but you’d be happy if you could just make a living off of your art, If you could just pay your bills with your art. That becomes your caret and your compromise.

Thinking about all this led me to create this song called “Lost With Dreams” I haven’t recorded it yet. My boy Willshire from Detroit produced the track for this and y’all will hear it soon enough. For now you can read the lyrics below.

Chorus
Sometimes I…Dream/ sometimes I sleep/ and then I wake up/ I wake up/ see I don’t…dream/ I just… sleep/ and in the morning/ in the morning/ in the morning I

verse
Feel mocked by the sky/ say if you’re scared to lose can’t win won’t try/ jump out the window/ fail fall die/ but you don’t want to die man you just want to fly/ can’t accomplish these things/ when you wasn’t born with wings/ and it’s a false accomplishment to achieve on the strings/ but you say fuck it/ go ahead and play puppet/ drop down to your knees and appease pleas to suck it/ acquire what you desire and perceive as what you must get/ if it’s something you must get/ get/ side of the bed/ open palms to the side of my head is where I sit/ refusing to admit that these shoes don’t fit/ every step I take/ there’s a smile to conceal the fact that it ache/ how long can I can kiss the snake and avoid the venom it make/ miss dreaming/ now it’s more often I sleep and wake

Sometimes I…Dream/ sometimes I sleep/ and then I wake up/ I wake up/ see I don’t…dream/ I just… sleep/ and in the morning/ in the morning/ in the morning I

Praise the lord I’m not dead/ thoughts so heavy it’s hard to raise my head up off the bed/ trying to get past the past/ I dash/ when I’m out of gas I crash like I aint know that I was going that fast/ life is a mascaraed/ I’m often missing a mask/ and the way I sometimes feels as is if I am missing mass/ still I stand for it/ say life passes most people by while they’re making grand plans for it/ paid the price and still can’t afford it/ as my mind tries to align the planets in my orbit/ think/ yeah it stink but it’s your shit/ I need a drink/ as I dive in the bottle and sink/ it shatter/ cut by the shards I bleed ink/ sadder/ if it was all for what I thought matter/ yeah I hate to suffer/ but fuck it I’d be glad ta/ just for the chance to get close enough to grab her